Manifest Illusions

A Reply to Axel Kohler

Author

Heiko Hecht

hecht @ uni-mainz.de

Johannes Gutenberg-Universität

Mainz, Germany

Commentator

Axel Kohler

axelkohler @ web.de

Universität Osnabrück

Osnabrück, Germany

Editors

Thomas Metzinger

metzinger @ uni-mainz.de

Johannes Gutenberg-Universität

Mainz, Germany

Jennifer M. Windt

jennifer.windt @ monash.edu

Monash University

Melbourne, Australia

The notion of illusion as a discrepancy between physical stimulus and percept (here referred to as illusiond, as long as merely this "error" is meant) is unable to capture the four very different cases in which illusions can arise. The observer may or may not be aware of the discrepancy, and its magnitude may be large or small. I argue that the special case of small error paired with awareness deserves special attention. Only in this case does the observer readily see the illusion, since it becomes manifest (referred to as illusionm). Illusionm is a meaningful category even in cases where illusiond cannot be determined. Illusionsm of apparent motion and illusions of intuitive physics are solicited.

Keywords

Apparent motion | Illusion | Illusionm | Intuitive physics | Manifest illusions | Relational properties | Underspecification problem