Introspective Insecurity

Author

Tim Bayne

tim.bayne @ manchester.ac.uk

The University of Manchester

Manchester, United Kingdom

Commentator

Maximilian H. Engel

M.H.Engel.1 @ student.rug.nl

Rijksunversiteit Groningen

Groningen, Netherlands

Editors

Thomas Metzinger

metzinger @ uni-mainz.de

Johannes Gutenberg-Universität

Mainz, Germany

Jennifer M. Windt

jennifer.windt @ monash.edu

Monash University

Melbourne, Australia

This paper examines the case for pessimism concerning the trustworthiness of introspection. I begin with a brief examination of two arguments for introspective optimism, before turning in more detail to Eric Schwitzgebel’s case for the view that introspective access to one’s own phenomenal states is highly insecure. I argue that there are a number of ways in which Schwitzgebel’s argument falls short of its stated aims. The paper concludes with a speculative proposal about why some types of phenomenal states appear to be more introspectively elusive than others.

Keywords

Cognitive phenomenology | Emotion | Freestanding judgments | Imagery | Introspection | Introspection-reliant | Optimism | Pessimism | Scaffolded judgments | Schwitzgebel