Buenting, J. M. (2005). The rejection of testimony and the normative recommendation of non- fallacious 'ad hominem' arguments based on Hume's 'Of Miracles' and Canadian Law. Auslegung, 27 (2), 1-16.
Clément, F. (2010). To trust or not to trust? Children's social epistemology. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1 (4), 531-549. 10.1007/s13164-010-0022-3
Coady, C. A. J. (1992). Testimony: A philosophical study. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Fricker, E. (1995). Telling and trusting: Reductionism and anti-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony. Mind, 104 (414), 393-411.
— (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66 (3), 377-388. 10.2307/2182440
— (1969). Utterer’s meaning and intentions. The Philosophical Review, 78 (2), 147-177. 10.2307/2184179
Groarke, L. (2011). Informal logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/
Harris, A. J. L., Hsu, A. & Madsen, J. K. (2012). Because Hitler did it! Quantitative tests of Bayesian argumentation using ad hominem. Thinking & Reasoning, 18 (3), 311-343. 10.1080/13546783.2012.670753
Jacob, P. (1987). Thoughts and belief ascriptions. Mind & Language, 2 (4), 301-325. 10.1111/j.1468- 0017.1987.tb00124.x
— (2008). What do mirror neurons contribute to human social cognition? Mind & Language, 23 (2), 190-223. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00337.x
— (2010). Intentionality. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intentionality/#9
— (2013). How from action-mirroring to intention-ascription? Consciousness and Cognition, 22 (3), 1132-1141. 10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.005
— (2015). Millikan’s teleosemantics and communicative agency. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.) Open MIND (pp. 1-22). Frankfurt a. M., GER: MIND Group.
Lackey, J. (2005). Testimony and the infant/child objection. Philosophical Studies, 162 (2), 163-190. 10.1007/s11098-004-7798-x
— (2006). It takes two to tango: Beyond reductionism and non- reductionism in the epistemology of testimony. In J. Lackey & E. Sosa (Eds.) The epistemology of testimony (pp. 160-189). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mascaro, O. & Sperber, D. (2009). The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception. Cognition, 112 (3), 367-380. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
— (1989). Biosemantics. The Journal of Philosophy, 86 (6), 281-297.
— (2004). Varieties of meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
— (2005). Language: A biological model. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance, communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sperber, D. (2001). An evolutionary perspective on testimony and argumentation. Philosophical Topics, 29 (1/2), 401-413. 10.5840/philtopics2001291/215
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G. & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25 (4), 359-39. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Van Eemeren, F. H., Garrsen, B. & Meuffels, B. (2008). Reasonableness in confrontation: Empirical evidence concerning the assessment of ad hominem fallacies. In F. H. Van Eemeren & . B. Garrsen (Eds.) Controversy and confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. 181-195). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.
Van Eemeren, F. H., Meuffels, v. B. & Verburg, M. (2000). The (un)reasonableness of ad hominem fallacies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19 (4), 416-435. 10.1177/0261927X00019004002
Walton, D. (1998). Ad hominem arguments. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
— (2008). Informal logic: A pragmatic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Yarp, A. (2013). Ad hominem fallacies, bias and testimony. Argumentation, 27 (2), 97-109. 10.1007/s10503-011-9260-5