<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><ncx version="2005-1" xmlns="http://www.daisy.org/z3986/2005/ncx/"><head><meta content="978-3-95857-046-7" name="dtb:uid"/><meta content="-1" name="dtb:depth"/><meta content="0" name="dtb:totalPageCount"/><meta content="0" name="dtb:maxPageNumber"/></head><docTitle><text>Are there Counterexamples to the Immunity Principle? Some Restrictions and Clarifications: A Commentary on Caleb Liang</text></docTitle><navMap><navPoint id="pt01html" playOrder="1"><navLabel><text>1 Introduction: Preliminaries and conceptual clarification</text></navLabel><content src="pt01.html"/></navPoint><navPoint id="pt02html" playOrder="2"><navLabel><text>2 The sense of body ownership vs. the sense of experiential ownership</text></navLabel><content src="pt02.html"/></navPoint><navPoint id="pt03html" playOrder="3"><navLabel><text>3 IEM-P—A conceptual matter?</text></navLabel><content src="pt03.html"/></navPoint><navPoint id="pt04html" playOrder="4"><navLabel><text>4 Two counterexamples to IEM-FP?</text></navLabel><content src="pt04.html"/></navPoint><navPoint id="pt05html" playOrder="5"><navLabel><text>5 Why does IEM-FP hold?</text></navLabel><content src="pt05.html"/></navPoint><navPoint id="pt06html" playOrder="6"><navLabel><text>6 Concluding remarks</text></navLabel><content src="pt06.html"/></navPoint></navMap></ncx>