%0 Book Section %A Liang, Caleb %D 2015 %T Can Experiential Ownership Violate the Immunity Principle? %E Metzinger, Thomas K. %E Windt, Jennifer M. %B Open MIND %C Frankfurt am Main %I MIND Group %& 24(R) %! Can Experiential Ownership Violate the Immunity Principle? %@ 9783958570948 %R 10.15502/9783958570948 %X In what follows, I respond to Haug and Jung’s criticisms of my target paper and defend the following claims: (1) the sense of experiential ownership can misrepresent the fact of experiential ownership; (2) the sense of experiential ownership is eligible to serve as a bearer of IEM; (3) at least some versions of IEM face genuine counterexamples; and (4) as far as the sense of self-as-subject is concerned, IEM is not a trivial property. Finally, I describe a new set of experiments that induced what I call “the self-touching illusion.” The data, I suggest, strengthen the view that both the sense of self-as-subject and IEM are open to empirical as well as philosophical investigation. %K Experiential ownership, Immunity principle, Self-as-subject, Self-touching illusion %U https://open-mind.net/papers/can-experiential-ownership-violate-the-immunity-principle-2014a-reply-to-oliver-haug-marius-f-jung %G English